15 results for 'cat:"Civil Rights" AND cat:"Malicious Prosecution" AND cat:"Police Misconduct"'.
J. Ross grants partial summary judgment to New York and three detectives who arrested and prosecuted a man for multiple traffic violations and drug possession, finding his false arrest and false imprisonment claims fail because the police had arguable probable cause to arrest him. Only his malicious prosecution claim related to his excessively tinted windows — not the claims pertaining to his drug possession or obstruction of governmental administration — and his excessive force claims arising from their decision to forcibly remove him from the car survive the motion.
Court: USDC Eastern District of New York, Judge: Ross, Filed On: March 28, 2024, Case #: 1:21cv285, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: civil Rights, malicious Prosecution, police Misconduct
J. Bell grants three police officers’ motion for summary judgment following allegations of malicious prosecution and assault, among others, brought by a motorist who was suicidal during her encounter with the officers. The motorist left a suicide note and took her husband’s pistol when she left their house, but called a police non-emergency number when she got lost. The dispatcher called the officers, who arrived at the house ahead of the motorist. She drove past, leading the officers to pursue her. Eventually, they all returned to the house, where the motorist claims she was physically forced out of her car and onto the ground. Also, allegedly one officer jammed his knee into her back, and she was forcibly arrested. Because there was probable cause to arrest her and the officers have sovereign immunity, they are granted summary judgment.
Court: USDC Western District of North Carolina, Judge: Bell, Filed On: February 29, 2024, Case #: 5:22cv157, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: civil Rights, malicious Prosecution, police Misconduct
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Kocoras denies Chicago and its police officers’ motion for summary judgment on a resident’s claims of unreasonable seizure, false arrest, and malicious prosecution, finding the resident has sufficiently alleged that police entered his home without a warrant and arrested him without probable cause.
Court: USDC Northern District of Illinois, Judge: Kocoras, Filed On: February 15, 2024, Case #: 1:22cv1564, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: civil Rights, malicious Prosecution, police Misconduct
J. Bencivengo allows the widow to pursue a deprivation of civil rights claim against certain individuals in her complaint alleging that the San Diego Sheriff's Department fabricated and mishandled evidence to advance their theory that she was responsible for her husband's death. The widow sufficiently alleges that certain detectives altered the crime scene, created a report contradicting an eyewitness statement, and omitted information from a witness in their police report. She also sufficiently alleges that a crime lab employee did not follow proper procedures in conducting his analysis of the blood found at the scene.
Court: USDC Southern District of California, Judge: Bencivengo, Filed On: January 16, 2024, Case #: 3:23cv1045, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: civil Rights, malicious Prosecution, police Misconduct
J. Flanagan grants summary judgment to a North Carolina town and two of its police officers on allegations of malicious prosecution and false imprisonment brought by a motorist who stopped his car in the middle of a street and berated one of the officers. A rail company shut down all but one railway intersection in the town, and police directed traffic as a result of build-up. The motorist, agitated about traffic, stopped his car and got out to say, “Do you know how to do your fucking job?” to an officer. A bystander recorded the interaction from a distance, in which the motorist continued to yell at the officer, who eventually began punching the motorist and attempting to arrest him. Two other officers helped in pinning him to the ground and arresting him. Given the motorist’s behavior, the malicious prosecution and false imprisonment claims fail because the officers had probable cause to arrest him.
Court: USDC Eastern District of North Carolina, Judge: Flanagan, Filed On: December 27, 2023, Case #: 5:22cv114, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: civil Rights, malicious Prosecution, police Misconduct
J. Reidinger concurs with a jury that a man who was allegedly beaten by police officers, who also allegedly shot and killed his dog during their arrest of the man, is not liable for battery on one of the officers who counter-sued him. The court also found that the six named law enforcement officers have no obligation to the man for their actions. However, the man was found to be liable to one of the officers for $40,000 in compensatory damages.
Court: USDC Western District of North Carolina, Judge: Reidinger, Filed On: November 17, 2023, Case #: 1:21cv217, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: civil Rights, malicious Prosecution, police Misconduct
J. Kness grants a narcotics officer’s motion for summary judgment on a Black Illinois man’s false arrest and malicious prosecution claims. The officer, looking to confirm the identity of and then arrest a Black drug dealer known as “Buzzy,” had another policeman pull over a suspect on a bogus traffic stop. The narcotics officer, after getting the suspect’s name, concluded it was Buzzy and charged the man on drug dealing offenses. At trial, a jury acquitted the man of all counts, and he claimed in his subsequent civil suit that the narcotics cop had accused him of being Buzzy simply because he was another Black man in the same age range. Despite this, the court believes the narcotics officer was justified in charging the man falsely identified as Buzzy, and also finds that the narcotics officer has qualified immunity.
Court: USDC Northern District of Illinois, Judge: Kness, Filed On: September 29, 2023, Case #: 1:20cv5072, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: civil Rights, malicious Prosecution, police Misconduct
J. Garaufis dismisses false arrest, malicious prosecution and excessive force claims against New York City and a group of city park officers stemming from the arrest of a woman for allegedly operating an illegal food stall in Flushing Meadows Park in Queens. The officers had probable cause to arrest her when she ignored their orders during the altercation. As well, their use of force was permitted after she tried to prevent them from handcuffing her.
Court: USDC Eastern District of New York, Judge: Garaufis, Filed On: August 29, 2023, Case #: 1:18cv4255, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: civil Rights, malicious Prosecution, police Misconduct
J. Block grants partial summary judgment to a group of six New York police officers on a woman’s civil rights violations stemming from her arrest on charges of assaulting her ex-husband with an umbrella. The court dismisses her claims for malicious prosecution, failure to intervene and Monell liability, but preserves one claim for false arrest, finding she was able to allege the reporting officers failed to seek information from unbiased witnesses while investigating the incident following a 911 call.
Court: USDC Eastern District of New York, Judge: Block, Filed On: June 13, 2023, Case #: 1:20cv3603, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: civil Rights, malicious Prosecution, police Misconduct
J. Shah partially grants a group of Chicago police officers’ motions for summary judgment on malicious prosecution, conspiracy and intentional tort claims, brought by a man wrongfully imprisoned by almost three decades. The police in question framed the man for a 1991 murder by planting false evidence and coercing his confession, and he was only released on an overturned conviction in 2018. The court grants judgment to several individual officers who have not been sufficiently tied to the framing, but the counts stand against the rest.
Court: USDC Northern District of Illinois, Judge: Shah, Filed On: May 22, 2023, Case #: 1:19cv2204, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: civil Rights, malicious Prosecution, police Misconduct